Dr Keith Farnsworth Publications



"Academic Output"

Highlighted Publications (K.D. Farnsworth)

(I give a very short explanation of the most relevant ones. For a full list of publications, please consult Google Scholar)

Here are the main papers on IFB subjects

Homeostatic set-points are physical and foundational to organism autonomy
K. D. Farnsworth (2025) BioSystems, 105634.
Explains how the set-point is coded in DNA, translated into molecular forms and transformed via emergence into the control characteristics (enzyme kinetic properties and reaction network topology) of a homeostatic system, especially using allosteric control -- in every cell.

How Physical Information Underlies Causation and the Emergence of Systems at all Biological Levels
K. D. Farnsworth (2025) Acta Biotheoretica, 73 (2), 6..
Distinguishes between physical, formal and statistical (Shannon) information, shows physical information is necessary for physical (efficient) cause and explains how information embodied at different organisational levels produce emergent properties, with examples from neuroscience and ecology.

How biological codes break causal chains to enable autonomy for organisms
K. D. Farnsworth (2023) BioSystems, 232.
Biological codes (e.g. genetic) do far more than translate from one medium to another. They enable biological systems to control whether physical information is causal or not. This paper established the description of information embodiment in concrete terms of medium, basis and scale. It shows how transducers work to strip off the force component of physical cause, leaving only information. This is the way biological systems break from strict cause-effect chains, otherwise mandatory for physical systems. 

Why it hurts: with freedom comes the biological need for pain
K. D. Farnsworth and RW Elwood (2023) Animal Cognition, 1-17.
Pain is not a signal, it is the product of a neurological system that integrates cognition of nosiception (noxious stimuli) with hormone-based evaluation for action selection (response). Pain is the qualitative feeling generated by the network-wide result of this integration. It is a mental command to attend to the source of the feeling and only justifiable for organisms that have a) alternate options for response and b) an anticipatory evaluation system with which to choose. This is an advanced application of control by information.

How an information perspective helps overcome the challenge of biology to physics
K. D. Farnsworth. (2022) BioSystems 217. 104683.
Distinguishes between physical, formal and statistical (Shannon) information, shows physical information is necessary for physical (efficient) cause and explains how information embodied at different organisational levels produce emergent properties, with examples from neuroscience and ecology.

An organisational systems-biology view of viruses explains why they are not alive
K. D. Farnsworth. (2020) Biosystems 200. 104324.
Whether or not viruses are alive depends on what we mean by life. I took an organisational view - life is an information process that necessarily involves closure to efficient causation (following Rosen's definition) and since no virus has that property, they are not alive. In this paper, I developed my ideas on formal and physical causation and their dependence on, respectively, different kinds of information.

How organisms gained causal independence and how it might be quantified
K. D. Farnsworth. (2019). Biology 7 (3), 38.
Identifies agency with agent causation and specifies the physical requirements for any system to have that property (only organisms qualify). Builds a nested hierarchy of control loops, with basic homeostasis at the core (level 1). Working outward: (2) perception-action systems; (3) action selection systems; (4) cognitive systems; (5) a self-model able to anticipate and evaluate actions and consequences. Each higher level is associated with a step up in causal independence. Using a mathematical framework to describe this, suggests Integrated Information Theory (IIT) as a means to quantify causal independence, which has generally increased through evolutionary developments identified by the levels of the hierarchy.   

Unifying concepts of biological function from molecules to ecosystems
KD Farnsworth, L Albantakis, T Caruso. (2018). Oikos 126 (10), 1367-1376
Defines function by causal role: function is a process performed by a component that is necessary for the performance of a higher level process by the system of which it is part (adapting Cummins, 1975). Uses the idea of a nested hierarchy of physically causal systems, from molecular interactions up to the entire global ecosystem. Function is a teleonomic term that can only make sense in the context of closure to efficient causation. A numerical worked example is provided and the overall 'master function' of biological systems is identified as biomass accumulation.

Can a Robot Have Free Will?
KD Farnsworth. (2017) Entropy 19 (5), 237.
Of course 'robot' originally meant slave, so the answer could be trivially - no. But more substantially, I used this paper to understand the scientific explanation for free will to exist at all (some scientists believe it to be impossible). It was here that I first applied Rosen's concept of closure to efficient causation (c.l.e.f.), reasoning that for free will to be meaningful it had to arise from agent causation. The paper shows that agent causation can only arise from a system with c.l.e.f. - in particular, since machines cannot (yet) make themselves, they do not have that property and so fail at least one of the necessary criteria for free will. Living systems do pass this test.


Living through Downward Causation
Farnsworth, K.D., Ellis, G.F.R. and Jaeger, L.(2017). Ch.13. in From Matter to Life. (Eds. Walker, S.I., Davis, P.C.W. and Ellis, G.F.R.). Cambridge University Press.
Introduces readers to the idea of functional information at multiple hierarchical levels of organisation - the cybernetic structure of living systems. Several examples illustrate how downward causation emerges and operates to effect the process of living, based on the developments reported in the 2013 Acta Biotheoretica paper.

Living is Information Processing: From Molecules to Global Systems
Farnsworth, K.D., Nelson, J., Gershenson, C. (2013). Acta Biotheoretica 62(2): 203-222.
Introduces information as a pattern of difference and shows how this can be causal through mutual effects of one pattern on another. Then multiple instances of this can form emergent systems; some capable of computation. Life is a nested hierarchy of these information complexes and it computes itself, using molecular interactions as the 'hardware': molecules embody the information for computation in their structures and life is the algorithm that computes itself. The 'hard' emergence implied by this hierarchical computation is shown to be physically plausible (countering Kim's exclusion argument) because it is nothing more than information appearing at higher organisational scales - an idea formalised in later papers (especially Farnsworth 2025, Acta Biotheoretica).

Functional Complexity: The source of value in biodiversity
Farnsworth, K.D., Lyashevska, O., Fung, T.C. (2012). Ecological Economics 11: 46–52.
Having established that biodiversity is information (total difference among organisms) and that at least some of this information is functional (defined in Farnsworth et al. Oikos 2018), its value derives from the ecological function that functional information content (FIC - Szostak, Nature 2003) affords. Ecological function was defined as stable community biomass production rate and measured for a complete set of hypothetical communities composed from subsets of a complete simulated community. Community complexity was measured by FIC/AIC (algorithmic information) and 'function' by stable biomass production in a quantitative implementation of the Noah's Ark problem, based on an ecological model of marine communities with growth, predation and recruitment. The result was an information metric for quantifying biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships, illustrated empirically (on model systems). Very roughly, the more complexity (FIC/AIC) the more function, but subject to a law of diminishing marginal returns.

Lyashevska, O., Farnsworth, K.D. (2012) How many dimensions of biodiversity do we need? Ecological Indicators, 18: 485-492.
Biodiversity includes phylogenetic and community composition and not only the count of differences, but the aggregate degree of difference - all amounting to information embodied in the ecological community. Hierarchical cluster analysis of a multitude of biodiversity indicators reveals three canonical axes of diversity. This work consolodated the idea of biodiversity as embodied information.

Some other ecology

K.D. Farnsworth, A.H. Adenuga, R.S. de Groot. (2015). The complexity of biodiversity: A biological perspective on economic valuation. Ecological Economics. (on line).

Focardi, S., Farnsworth, K.D., Poli, B.M., Ponzetta, M.P., Tinelli, A. (2003). Sexual segregation in ungulates: individual behaviour and the missing link. Population Ecology, 45: 83-95.

Farnsworth, K.D., Focardi, S., Beecham, J. (2002). Coexistence and facilitation of animals from grassland-herbivore interactions. The American Naturalist, 159: 24-39.

Farnsworth, K.D., Anderson, A.R.A. (2001). How simple grazing rules lead to reaction diffusion systems and their consequence for vegetation community dynamics. Oikos, 95:15-24.

Ruxton, G.D., Humphries, S., Farnsworth, K.D. (2001). Non-competitive phenotypic differences can have a strong effect on ideal free distributions. Journal Of Animal Ecology, 70: 25-32.

Beecham, J.A., Farnsworth, K.D. (1999). Animal group forces resulting from predator avoidance and competition minimisation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 198: 533-548.

Farnsworth, K.D., Beecham, J.A. (1999). How do grazers achieve their distribution? A continuum of models from random diffusion to the ideal free distribution using biased random walks. American Naturalist, 153: 509-526.

Farnsworth, K.D ., Illius, A.W. (1998). Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model. Functional Ecology Vol. 12. pp74-81.

Farnsworth. K.D., Beecham, J.A. (1997). Beyond the ideal free distribution: a more general model of predator distribution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 187. pp 389-396.

Farnsworth, K.D., Niklas, K.J. (1995). Theories of optimisation form and function in branching architecture in plants. Functional Ecology, Vol. 9. pp 355-363.

Some related marine biology

Fung, T. Farnsworth, K.D. Reid, D.G.and Rossberg A.G. (2015).
Impact of biodiversity loss on production in complex marine food webs mitigated by prey-release. Nature Comms. 6. 10.1038/ncomms7657

Houle, J.E., Andersen, K.H., Farnsworth, K.D., Reid, D.G. (2013). Emerging asymmetric interactions between forage and predator fisheries impose management trade-offs. J. Fish Biology. Online: 10.1111/jfb.12163